Words about my career: a few Star Tribune employees look back

Name a news story in recent memory and it’s likely that someone leaving the Star Tribune this month wrote about it, photographed it, wrote a headline for it or served the story in some other vital but anonymous way. There's a crowd behind the production of most every newspaper story.

Yet the industry upheaval in newspapers requires smaller staffs, so the 44 people leaving the paper (and that number should climb to 50 soon) are going before they could leave their full measure of work at the Star Tribune. It’s a loss for readers, but maybe a gain for audiences online.

Those who are leaving take with them an institutional memory compiled here and abroad, at the polls, in the courts, behind police barriers, with grieving families, with prize winners and speechmakers, and a wrestler turned politician. Always on deadline.

Here's what a few had to say about their careers, starting with Chuck Haga, a literary workhorse who, when asked this week where he would go next, said “probably into the woods.”

 

Chuck Haga

The story I most enjoyed doing was in 1988 when I talked the editors into letting me follow John Steinbeck’s route in Travels With Charley, the book he wrote after roaming the country in the weeks leading up to the 1960 presidential election. I started by talking with Elaine Steinbeck, his widow, who allowed me to see where Charley the poodle was buried and the little shack where the book was written.

In the next 10 weeks, I traveled through about 36 states, stopping every Friday to write an essay for the Sunday paper, touching variously on race, abortion, the environment, how we felt about the Russians, the election -- all the things Steinbeck wrote about.

I talked to hundreds of ordinary Americans, played bingo with the Mohawks in upstate New York, danced at a Cajun music hall in Houma, La., with a woman who startled me by saying she had buried three husbands and was looking for a fourth, attended a Southern Baptist revival meeting in Maggie Valley, N.C., and ultimately came to know Steinbeck, our country and myself better.

I sat one night on the rocky coast of Oregon, with wine and sourdough bread bought earlier that day in Seattle, and listened to the Pacific Ocean. I felt a presence at my back -- a physical presence -- and I turned and realized it was all the country I had passed through, including the Atlantic off Sag Harbor, Long Island, my jumping-off point.

The stories I think I’m proudest of are those about ordinary people who weren’t famous or infamous, rich or powerful, including the 60 or 70 stories I’ve done over the years about people who took part in World War II. After profiling five guys who took part in D-Day, and five guys who survived Pearl Harbor, a nurse from southwestern Minnesota somewhere who held bloody hands on the beach at Anzio, a Shakopee gardener who learned about hunger and starvation as a POW in Germany, a girl who gave up her tricycle in a scrap drive -- I’ve never been able since to look at a man in his 80s without thinking, “He might have landed on Omaha Beach.” (My big regret is not putting a bunch of them in a book and calling it “The Greatest Generation” before Tom Brokaw thought of doing that.)

Many of the stories of the past few years have been sadder stories, and I think they took a toll on me over time: the abduction and murder of Dru Sjodin, Erika Dalquist and other young women; the deaths of soldiers and Marines in Iraq and Afghanistan; the shootings near Rice Lake, Wis., and at Red Lake High School. They were all important stories that needed to be done. But it broke my heart every time I listened to Allan Sjodin smile and talk about his daughter.

 

Doug Grow

Columnist Doug Grow has 3,485 bylines in the newspaper’s computerized database, and that’s counting just since 1986 when the database was created. Grow pre-dates it by seven years. His columns included the story of a stolen dog returned, the life’s work of a man who cared for the poor, and the passing of the manually operated elevators in St. Paul City Hall in 1986. He started at the paper in 1979.

Q: What story impacted you most?

A: It’s hard to describe the one that had the most impact on me. It was a little girl who committed suicide up in Roseville. Named Kathi Vonderhaar. It involved youth hockey and a sexual assault and nothing ever happened to [the perpetrators] and it drove her to suicide.

Q: What was your focus as a columnist?

A: There are so many, so many incredible people that are so self sacrificing and are so damned decent, so this is a vehicle where you can actually tell some of those stories. Sometimes I’m just overwhelmed. It’s an incredible gig because you get to meet this remarkable people. I used to work at the Post-Dispatch and every day there was this big sign on the wall when you walked into there, ‘Afflict the comfortable and comfort the afflicted.’ So there’s a certain element of that. I suppose that’s some of that 1960s stuff. We are blessed to just be surrounded by so many great people. If I’m interested in something I figure there’s a fightin’ chance that someone else is interested in it and try not to be terribly predictable.

Q: Did you feel like you were effective in solving problems?

A: The key thing is, I don’t want to sound falsely modest or anything but it’s not me. It’s this forum, so sometimes you actually can do things. It’s always amazing you can write about some poor schlub and terrible things are happening to and you get no response. You write about a dog and people from all over start emoting. It’s one of the strange things that I’ve never quite understood. So whenever you think nobody’s reading you have to write about a dog.

Q: So what’s next?

A: I don’t like the word retire, so I’ve got to keep working. I have some things I’d like to do. The beauty of this job is you can do it as something you believe in and still get paid. So whatever is next I hope it’s in that same category. I doubt that it’s writing, simply because this market, the freelance market is filled, but there are some things that I really have strong feelings about and I’d like to get involved in, be it public education or something along those lines, become an advocate of some sort maybe.

Q: What do you think about where this industry’s headed?

A: One of the reasons to go is I’m not necessarily convinced that we’re headed in the right direction now. And I hope I’m wrong, because I want the paper to succeed. I really believe in the end that the franchise is still ours to wake the town and tell the people that the news is more than the most recent murder, that our audience is very engaged, very involved. Sure it’s going to be more online, but you can’t replace reporters on the street. And there’s got to be a place for this. Maybe it’s going to have to be in a non profit, public radio format. I don’t know, but there’s got to be something. And it’s not because of what you and I do as individuals, but because of what the business is about. There’s got to be a place for it. And nobody else is doing it.

Q: Have you gotten your acceptance letter for the company buyout program?

A: I got accepted. I applied and I got accepted! The first time I ever applied to something and they said ‘Hell yes!’ So it can’t be a real exclusive group. June 15 appears to the last day. So now I’m cranking out something for tomorrow.

 

Sharon Schmickle

A veteran reporter who covered, among other things, agriculture, politics, biotechnology and, eventually, the ties between Minnesota and the rest of the world, Schmickle was a 1995 finalist for the Pulitzer prize. She recently has covered the state's Liberian community. She plans to continue writing and reporting.

There is this funeral, see. Everybody’s grieving and weeping. Suddenly the corpse (the Star Tribune) sits bolt upright in the coffin and says “I ain’t dead.” It is way premature to cry for this newspaper. Good God, several hundred thousand people still read it, and they care so much about it they act like they own it -- call us every day and tell us how to do our jobs. And we’ve only just begun to tap the power of online publication with all of its potential to tell our stories in rich new dimensions.

This is a pivotal time, though. And that makes it a good time to leave. Since I went to the Washington bureau in 1993, I’ve covered Minnesota’s interests from a national and international perspective. I’ve reported from 24 different countries, most recently Iraq, Afghanistan, Thailand, Egypt and Greece. Now, as the newspaper prepares to turn intensely local, that resume isn’t a good fit. So it’s time for me to move on.

 

Joe Kimball

Joe Kimball, who for 20 years covered the St. Paul beat, said he wanted to continue writing his Around St. Paul column but it was killed. A 31-year employee of the newspaper, he plans to start a new career.

Over the years I’ve covered courts, government, the Legislature, but loved the St. Paul beat the best.

My biggest story ever came in my first year. I’d been hired as a Sunday features writer, and was headed up towards Duluth one morning to write about a strawberry farmer when I heard on the radio that Duluth police were reporting a double homicide; no more details. I pulled over at a gas station -- no cell phones in those days -- and called the office to ask if I could please cover murders instead of strawberries. The news hadn’t hit the wires yet, so they said ok.

Of course it turned out to be the Congdon murders, the heiress and her night nurse killed in a plot by her son in law to speed up the inheritance. I stayed the rest of the summer in Duluth, covered Roger’s trial the next summer and Marjorie’s trial the following summer. Had to testify at that one.

Marjorie went on to a career as a sociopath, getting charged with bigamy, two arsons, another murder, and now, fraud and forgery. I covered every twist for the newspaper. When Glensheen, the Congdon Mansion, opened for tours in 1979, they wouldn’t even acknowledge on the tours that murders had occurred, so I wrote a history of the case, and tour guide, which has sold more than 75,000 copies. I update it nearly every year, to keep up with Marjorie’s antics. Memorial Day weekend I signed books at the mansion.


Posted in   Matt_McKinney's blog | login to post comments

This is not just caused by

This is not just caused by the impact of the Internet. This is being seen across the nation as newspapers move farther and farther to the left and continue to lose their readership. There is a reason the nickname of the Strib is the "Red Star!". The editor's need to finally wake up and figure out to get back readership they need to produce content that is balanced and somewhat objective. Look at the liberal rags (and the Strib is one of them) across the country they are all losing readership. I cancelled my subscription close to a year ago, I could no longer relate to the content that was being spewed out on the pages and presented as balanced reporting. Editor's get a clue, go back to the true mandates of journalism. I say good riddance to most of you.


Chuck Haga's travels

Is there any way to get a copy of Chuck Haga's series of articles on his travels that followed the same route of John Steinbecks' Travels with Charlie?


I totally agree with the

I totally agree with the above statement. I use to and still do call the Trib "Pravda" it was way to far to the left and totally out of touch with the state of Minnesota. Today is a great day and reforces the concept of free market and the Libs at "Pravada" are finding out that even they are not untouchable.
HOORAY FOR MINNESTOA!!!!! Maybe now we can get some fair balanced reporting. Maybe a 50/50 right and left not 90/10 Far left.


This is not just caused by...

Wow "anonymous" such venom spewed and no guts to sign with your name? Kind of a spineless criticism, if that's what you call it.
There are a number of factors that led to the changes within the newspaper industry, but liberal viewpoints is not one of them, otherwise wouldn't the Pioneer Press pick up the readers that StarTribune lost since PP is considered to be more conservative?
And if you are so hateful of the StarTribune, what took you so long to cancel your subscription? BUT, you seem to be okay with contributing to StarTribune owned Web sites. Call me crazy, but isn't this a tad hypocritical?
People have been calling the Strib the "Red Star" for years so it might behoove you to find another name to spew. Maybe, Doodyhead or buttface as this seems to be the appropriate emotional level that you would understand.
As for the newsroom staff leaving, I wish you all the best and good luck. Maybe band together and start an online news site that competes with StarTribune? Food for thought.
Anyway, it saddens me to see the changes that are taking place in the newspaper industry and journalists, the news as well as the community pay the price for short-sighted decisions.

We are not better off ~


What are you guys smoking?

Star Tribune liberal? What are you guys smoking? Kathereine Kersten? Not liberal. Doug Tice? Not liberal. And when was the last time you saw a liberal on the opinion page? George Will, Jonah Golberg & Monah Charen are definitely not liberal. Do you idiots even know who those guys are? And if the Strib is liberal, why didn't they print the Downing Street Memo? Or cover the Jeff Gannon episode?
The Strib might've been slightly left-of-center back when it was owned by Cowles Media, but now it is a corporate cheerleader for publicly subsidized ballparks and luxury "loft" condominiums.
Do you morons even look into who owns the paper or do you just parrot whatever Rush Limbaugh & Matt Drudge say? SQUAWK SQUAWK! CRACKER WANT A POLLY!
The reason readership is down -- not just in Minneapolis, but all over the nation -- is because of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which allowed the consolidation of newspaper ownership by billionaires who don't give a rat's posterior about news. And now it's going from bad to worse. At least McLatchey & Knight Ridder (again, I'm sure you dolts have no idea who I'm talking about) felt a desire to maintain the illusion of objectivity. But now that the paper is owned by Avista, a private equity company, you can be sure the Strib will become another McNewspaper like USAToday with all kinds of colorful grafs to tell us how many pounds of hotdogs baseball fans eat every year and other useful infotainment, and you knuckle-draggers will finally have a paper you can enjoy.


We are better off...

It amazes me how deluded some people are. The Star Trib was so dominated by one viewpoint and held so many opinions that were counter and offensive to so many Minnesotans yet the defense is, "Oh, you're a stupid childish idiot who can't rise above name calling."
The fact is the Wall Street Journal and New York Post are expanding while the rest of print which is almost uniformly liberal is shrinking.
I don't think it is necessarily a matter of liberalism is wrong (although I do think today's liberalism is completely wrong). I think it is a matter of supply and demand. There is plenty of supply on the liberal side but there is very little supply on the conservative side. My guess is that demand is about equal for both. Now that the internet has allowed everyone to find whatever they like the conservatives are canceling their New York Times subscription and getting their news online.
This is the same reason Rush has done so well. He broke into a market with practically no competition. Air America on the other hand has to compete with most of print, TV and public radio.
The liberal domination of print and media in general is the reason so many papers are withering. Once they add some balance for real and not as window dressing they will come back. You'll see.

James Peterson
Ames, Iowa


New York Post, eh?

Is that the type of paper you want here? If so, we're in bigger trouble than I thought. You must be part of the 27 percent, eh, James?


Early retirements at Star Tribune

I was shocked to go down the list of names of those leaving the Star Tribune on June 15, 2007. These departures are a huge loss for the paper, the readers, and the community. If anyone thinks the loss of these folks won't be seen in the quality of the product, they are deluding themselves.

I left the Star Tribune in 1994 after 18 years in management positions. My dad had 42 years before me. I bargained across the table from several of these people who were worthy adversaries.

I can tell you that there is life after the Star Tribune. I hope all follow their hearts and have a grand future.


not politics

Do any of you actually read articles about why Star Tribune and other newspapers are struggling? It's actually been covered fairly well in our local papers as well as by the national media. And it has nothing to do with politics.

It has to do with advertising. Specifically classified advertising and national retail advertising. Both have migrated away from newspapers in recent years. This has caused a revenue shortfall creating the current situation. The current owners of the Star Tribune have decided to cut staff as a way of making up for that shortfall.


Nick Coleman commenting as Cathy

The Pioneer Press is only seen as more conservative when compared to a rag a left-leaning as the Strib.

You pine away for the good old days... and that saddens me. Things change... if it is worth saving it will stay.

By the way, I'm trying to compete (in a way) with the strib... anti-strib.com
...the Strib makes it too easy. Like fish in a barrel.


Pro-Strib?

Now that the Strib is owned by venture capitalists, will you be changing the name of your blog?


Why don't you tell us what

Why don't you tell us what you really think?


"This is not just caused by"...

Very well stated.

Your words represent those of MILLIONS of us.


Nope, it's really Cathy

but, "anonymous" I like that you thought I was Nick Coleman.

Not pining away for the old days when I say that it's sad to see the changes taking place in the newspaper industry. It's sad that the decisions are now being made by shareholders and Wall Street... people who do not have any experience calling the shots. The bottom-line in the long run is not necessarily served by cutting newsroom staff.

Yes, the Internet opens the gates for everyone to join in on the conversation, but are you saying that bloggers are more objective than reporters? It's sad to see journalism treated as a commodity.

Again, I will say "good luck" to all Stribbers who have chosen the buyout and hopefully you will land in a better place.

Oh, and one more AGAIN... be creative and think of another name other than "Red Star"... it's old and tired and so twenty years ago.


Can't say "red star"???

"...be creative and think of another name other than "Red Star"... it's old and tired and so twenty years ago."

Yeah, that's fine Nick Coleman, but the Lourve is still called the Lourve. Nick Coleman's name is so 1960s, but it would be foolish to change it (aside, it would be a case of mutton dressing up as lamb if he changed his name).

The Red Star is the Red Star... and the Enemy Paper... and Pravda Minnesota.

Great, there are a couple of columnists who are not commies... that doesn't make the Strib slant to the right. Far from it.

"Blah, blah, blah... change name of anti-strib to pro-strib"

You think the left-leaning slant is going away? Probably not.


yes politics

Although your assertion that advertising dollars and not politics are to blame for the decline in the newspaper industry is correct on the surface, this situation itself is caused by a political mindset that demands unheard of profits from papers, usually at the expense of quality journalism.


Chuck Haga's articles

Yes, I would also be interested in Chuck Haga's series of articles. Is it somewhere to be found? Maybe on the web ;-) the menace of the newspaper?


"I felt a presence at my

"I felt a presence at my back -- a physical presence -- and I turned and realized it was all the country I had passed through"

Those are the kinds of lines you wrote, Chuck, that made me feel more like I was reading great literature than a daily newspaper.

Best of luck, and keep telling those stories.


smaller staffs

"requires smaller staffs" ??? Where is that justified? What is the proof of that? Has it been repeated so often that now it is true? Required for what? For cosmetic journalism?
"requires" indeed.


Word choice

Requires, in the sense that we are required at the end of the day to make the revenue side match the expense side of the balance sheet. "Dictates" would have worked, too, but it's not meant as an editorial comment. It's just what's happening to the industry as advertising revenue disappears.


Brilliant retort

I'm convinced. I didn't know you were going to take the intellectual approach. Oh, btw, it's spelled L-O-U-V-R-E.


mixed metaphors

revenues and expenses are on the income statement, assets and liabilities on the balance sheet


> Yeah, that's fine Nick

> Yeah, that's fine Nick Coleman, but
> the Lourve is still called the Lourve.

No, you idiot, it's called the Louvre. Learn to spell.


Frog insults, Louvre

Ah, so Frog takes the high road... at least BDM (I think that's the person) merely corrected me. (Clearly a double-dumbass on me.)

I suspect my reasoning still stands... or am I an idiot? Care to debate the point or would you like to worry about how to spell your mother's name?

Learn to converse with folks, or go get your shinebox.

(I should just spell it Lourve again just to annoy the dweeb... lol!)


what point?

What point are we debating? That Cathy is actually Nick Coleman? Or that all but three or four Strib employees are commies? And speaking of commies, that is so 80s. Maybe you should switch to "terrorist lovers," since terrorists are the new commies.


bdm you really need to get a

bdm you really need to get a life


Life is Change

I'm gonna miss all these wonderful folks. A lot of years serving the community reporting news, telling stories and taking photographs.

The bylines seem like old friends. Good luck to those who are re-inventing themselves, to those who are just gonna take it easy and to those who are a little bit scared about the next step of the journey.

Life is change. You will be missed.


liberal, conservative, whatever

I just find this comment funny because I work for a conservative-by-any-definition daily paper and the "conservative rags" are losing circ. too. And our readers say things just like you did, blaming it on the politics. It's just not true, or it wouldn't be happening to all newspapers, with their diversity of editorial stances. Much of it is going online, some of it just is the slow bleed we've seen for decades going to TV news. (Which, if you'd like to compare, is usually more highly political than any paper you could pick up.)

Anyway, my congrats and condolences to the departing. I hope you're right about the Strib being far from dead.


The fact that Doug Grow

The fact that Doug Grow readily admits he loved the philosophy of "Comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable" is all the evidence you need of his agenda and the general agenda of the typical writer at the paper.

Templates. It's all about cliched templates that they work from. The poor are always noble and hard-working. The rich are always conniving and manipulative.

People who don't agree with this adolescent understanding of society don't want to pay to have it crammed down their throats every day.


You're correct - it's not politics

I don't know who ad man is, but he/she/they obviously understand the situation. Read the real (Please, not just blogs!) history of the current owners of the Strib and the owners of the Pioneer Press. You will find deeply rooted ties to the political right wing.
As a carrier - a paperboy if you will - for the past 15 years, I have watched the subscribers drop like a rock since the internet became the lead source of information. What I read on the Strib.com homepage Friday evening before leaving my office (most of us carriers have "real" jobs - we use carrier money to pay for kids' college, sports, etc.) is the same headlines and stories I see at the Strib depot at 3:00am the next morning - what you pick up off your dooorstep at 7:00am. It's yesterday's news and everyone under 35 has already read it online, read the comments about it on various websites, and are moving on to their next arguement. The newspaper is obsolete until newspapers begin to do "investigative reporting" again.
As a carrier, I knew Saturday morning I could have put last Sunday's paper in a big mailing envelope. The week before Mother's Day - I knew Saturday morning that Sunday's paper would barely fit in the bag you usually get it in. The paper is really just a vehicle to distribute advertising. Any subscribers remember 10 years ago when you were getting a free sample of something - cereal, razors, instant coffee, etc - just about every weekend? Not anymore and that's lost revenue. People usually comment when they quit the paper. The Strib likes to blame the carriers, so we are forwarded the comments. Most say the same thing: The news isn't news and their recycling gets bigger while the information gets smaller.
Cut the liberal controlled media crap. George Bush the 1st has a good buddy who now owns the Pioneer Press. Dan Quayle lived off his wife's fortune: Her grandfather was one the the East Coast's richest newspaper conglomerates. Newspaper owners forgot what news meant. They became sellers of print space.


Latest image